Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Estate of Emily Reardon, James Reardon Administrator v. Monsees et al
as 2:2022cv02625
Plaintiff:
Estate of Emily Reardon, James Reardon Administrator
Defendant:
James Monsees, Philip Morris USA Inc., Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Eby v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2021cv02812
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
John Eby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Luke v. Lambert et al
as 1:2017cv00063
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Luke
Defendant:
Krys Lambert , Andy Eby , Jennifer Shockley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ebie v. City of Pataskala Division of Police et al
as 2:2016cv00283
Plaintiff:
Charles M Ebie
Defendant:
City of Pataskala Division of Police, Bruce Brooks, Trevor Colles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Luke v. Eby et al
as 1:2015cv00288
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Luke
Defendant:
Andy Eby, Jennifer Shockley, Krys Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Eby v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv01878
Plaintiff:
Debra A. Eby
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
