Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Balentine v. Abbot et al
as 4:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
John Balentine
Defendant:
Greg Abbot, Bryan Collier - TDCJ Director, David Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden et al
as 3:2022cv01306
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Warden, NFN Wonders, NFN Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calton v. Gutierrez et al
as 1:2021cv00846
Plaintiff:
Allen F. Calton
Defendant:
David G. Gutierrez, James La Favers, Carmella Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. GUTIERREZ et al
as 4:2021cv01641
Respondent:
DAVID GUTIERREZ, Brian Long, LINDA MOLINA and others
Petitioner:
Quintin Phillippe Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Jones et al
as 4:2018cv04503
Defendant:
Fred Solis, Brian Long, David Gutierrez and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Shaw v. Gutierrez et al
as 1:2018cv00776
Defendant:
Frederico Rangel, Michelle Skyrme, David Gutierrez and others
Plaintiff:
Duane J. Shaw, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Young v. David Gutierrez, et al
as 18-70023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID GUTIERREZ, JAMES LAFAVERS, BRIAN LONG and others
Young v. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2018cv02420
Defendant:
Federico Rangel, Brian Long, Fred Solis and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Anthony Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McBride v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2018cv01437
Plaintiff:
Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division, TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00372
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
