Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Fry v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv02503
Plaintiff:
Edmund Joseph Fry III and Edmund J. Fry
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Fry III v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv01627
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Kristin Pulatie, Joseph B. Gaffney and others
Plaintiff:
Edmund Joseph Fry III and Edmund Joseph John Fry, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fry et al v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2021cv00862
Plaintiff:
T.F. and Edmund Joseph Fry III
Defendant:
No Named Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Parlett et al
as 1:2018cv02677
Defendant:
Joseph Bolin, Scott Dzikowski, Maria Hall and others
Plaintiff:
George Willis Wright and George Willis Wright, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patel v. Bill Barrett Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00394
Plaintiff:
Surekha Patel
Defendant:
Jim W. Mogg, Bill Barrett Corporation, R. Scot Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Connor v. Bill Barrett Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00323
Plaintiff:
Howard Connor
Defendant:
Bill Barrett Corporation, Jim W. Mogg, William F. Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Campos v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv02980
Plaintiff:
Hoctabiano Campos
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Inch, Edmund Randolph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook et al v. PenSa, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02667
Petitioner:
Richard (I) Cook , Mary (I) D. Cook , Richard (I) M. Hughes and others
Respondent:
PenSa, Inc., Louis (I) W. Pendleton, Edmund (I) A. Pendleton and others
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
Alvarado v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2014cv02476
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Edmund Alvarado
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
