Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Raghavendra v. Fenn
as 20-4273
Respondent:
Allison Martin, Individually and as Attorney/Partner at Proskauer Rose, LLP., Louis D. Stober, Jr., Individually and as Attorney at Law Offices of Louis D. Stober, Jr. LLC., Edward A. Brill, Individually and as Attorney/Partner at Proskauer Rose, LLP. and others
Plaintiff:
National Association for Clients against Dishonest Attorneys
Petitioner:
R. S. Raghavendra, Founder, RESCUE Ad Hoc Committee; National Association For Clients Against Dishonest Attorneys as assignee of Randy S. Raghavendra, AKA Randy S. Raghavendra
Raghavendra v. Fenn
as 19-3594
Respondent:
Louis D. Stober, Jr., Individually and as Attorney at Law Offices of Louis D. Stober, Jr. LLC., Allison Lynn Martin, Individually and as Attorney/Partner at Proskauer Rose, LLP., Law Offices of Louis D. Stober, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Rajagopala Sampath Raghavendra, Founder, RESCUE Ad Hoc Committee; National Association For Clients Against Dishonest Attorneys as assignee of Randy S. Raghavendra, AKA Randy S. Raghavendra
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
BRILL v. ALLENTOWN METAL WORKS, INC. et al
as 5:2008cv05354
Plaintiff:
EDWARD T. BRILL
Defendant:
ALLENTOWN METAL WORKS, INC. and JAMES GALLAGHER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
