Cases 11 - 20 of 23
US v. David Edward Adam
as 16-6528
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID EDWARD ADAMS
US v. David Adam
as 15-6912
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID EDWARD ADAMS
In re: Michael Adams
as 15-11038
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL EDWARD ADAMS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bridgepoint Ventures, LLC et al v. Panam Management Group, Inc et al
as 1:2013mc00392
Plaintiff:
Bridgepoint Ventures LLC , Bridgepoint Purchasers and Ascent Acquisitions LLC
Defendant:
Panam Management Group, Inc, James Monahan, Obermayer & Adams and others
Cause Of Action: M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment
Bridgepoint Ventures, LLC v. Panam Management Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2013mc01010
Defendant:
Edward Adams, James Monahan, Obermayer & Adams, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Bridgepoint Ventures, LLC
USA v. Charles Adam
as 13-6418
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD ADAMS
Macgill et al v. Baltimore County of Maryland et al
as 1:2013cv01017
Plaintiff:
Charles Macgill and Mary Jane Macgill
Defendant:
Baltimore County of Maryland, Kevin Kamenetz and Edward Adams
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Bridgepoint Ventures, LLC v. Panam Management Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2010mc22050
Plaintiff:
Bridgepoint Ventures, LLC
Defendant:
Panam Management Group, Inc., James Monahan, Obermayer & Adams, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Sean Payton, et al. v. Knauf Gips KG, et al.
as LAE/2:09-CV-07628
Plaintiff:
JOHN CONROY, Thomas Cox, Michelle Egan and others
Defendant:
Knauf Gips KG and Knauf Plasterboard (Tianjin) Co., LTD.
Petitioner:
Thaddeus L. Hunter and Ronald Joachim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
