Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BELL v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01146
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD BELL, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bell v. Osceola County Corrections
as 6:2022cv02231
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Osceola County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL IV v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67107
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BELL IV
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv94995
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv84717
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv68866
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD BELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv02067
Plaintiff:
MARY D. WALLACE, PAUL BERRY, NATHAN BROWN and others
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jean-Gilles et al v. National Football League et al
as 1:2013cv21205
Plaintiff:
Max Jean-Gilles , Titus Adams , Miranda Adams and others
Defendant:
National Football League and NFL Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Bell v. Henderson
as 6:2010cv00392
Plaintiff:
Ralph Edward Bell
Defendant:
Les Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Bell v. Scalf
as 6:2010cv00391
Plaintiff:
Ralph Edward Bell
Defendant:
Daniel Bruce Scalf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
