Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hamilton v. Edwards et al
as 1:2020cv07108
Defendant:
Oscar Pebollo, Sgt. Paul Lindert, Officer Christopher Beltran and others
Plaintiff:
Briyton William Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Portillo et al v. Beard et al
as 5:2013cv04656
Petitioner:
Edward Portillo
Respondent:
R. Davis, J. Beard and J. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Portillo v. Davis et al
as 2:2013cv01976
Petitioner:
Edward Portillo
Respondent:
R. Davis, J. Beard and J. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edward Portillo v. USDC-CALA
as 13-71900
:
In re: EDWARD PORTILLO
Petitioner:
EDWARD PORTILLO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
VIVIAN PORTILLO
Edward Portllio v. Superior Court of California et al
as 2:2013cv01236
Petitioner:
Edward Portillo
Respondent:
Vivian Portillo and Superior Court of California
Edward Portillo v. Darrell Adams, et al
as 11-56943
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD PORTILLO
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden and SUSAN HUBBARD, Director of Adult California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
Edward Portillo v. USDC-CALA
as 10-73911
:
In re: EDWARD PORTILLO
Petitioner:
EDWARD PORTILLO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
SUSAN HUBBARD, Director of Adult California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden and RICHARD SUBIA, Director CDCR
Edward Portillo v. Darrell Adams, et al
as 10-55925
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD PORTILLO
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, Warden and SUSAN HUBBARD, Director of Adult California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
Edward Portillo v. Darrel G. Adams et al
as 2:2009cv05630
Petitioner:
Edward Portillo
Respondent:
Darrel G. Adams and Susan Hubbard
Defendant:
Richard Subia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
