Cases 1 - 10 of 1,987
BROWN v. AMANDA et al
as 5:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN EDWARD BROWN
Defendant:
AMANDA, WALKER, DENISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. WIZA
as 1:2024cv01930
Petitioner:
JAMES MARCEL EDWARDS
Respondent:
Sgt. Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Bucci et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Defendant:
Noelani G. Skipper, Judge Dean Bucci, Jerald David Westmorland and others
Plaintiff:
Kamiliah Edwards
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
RUSSAW v. TALTON et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARIO RUSSAW
Defendant:
CULLEN TALTON, ADA RODRIGO L SILVA, EDWARD D LUKEMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PPF AMLI Roxboro Rd v. Fox
as 1:2024cv01810
Plaintiff:
PPF AMLI Roxboro Rd doing business as AMLI 3464
Defendant:
Edward Fox
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
EDWARDS v. WIZA
as 5:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
JAMES MARCEL EDWARDS
Respondent:
SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elliott v. Bison Plumbing, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Michael Elliott
Defendant:
Bison Plumbing, Inc., Bison Plumbing Services, Inc., Michael Tadlock and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Lackey v. Unnamed
as 1:2024cv01123
Petitioner:
James Edward Lackey, Jr.
Respondent:
Unnamed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
Piedmont Healthcare, Inc. and University Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
