Cases 41 - 50 of 1,241
Metz v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01586
Plaintiff:
Larry Edward Metz
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Meyers v. Hedrick et al
as 5:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Edward Hedrick, Alexander County Superior Court, Alexander County District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01580
Plaintiff:
James Gibson, II and James Edward Gibson, II
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
King v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01514
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward King
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Dugger v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02242
Petitioner:
Edward Roy Dugger
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dugger v. State of North Carolina
as 1:2023cv00317
Petitioner:
Edward Roy Dugger
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dib v. F4L Sports, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Michael Dib
Defendant:
F4L Sports, Inc., Perk Fitness of Spring Lake, Inc., Fit4Life Franchising, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Collins v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01458
Plaintiff:
Clark Edward Collins, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Edwards v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01389
Plaintiff:
Donald Edwards
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Jackson, Jr. v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01387
Plaintiff:
Edward Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
