Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Brooks v. Hogan
as 21-1785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Brooks
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Hogan, Former OMH Commissioner, Richard P. Miraglia, Former Associate Commissioner, OMH, Maureen Bosco, Executive Director, CNYPC and others
Defendant:
Emmet Creahan, Director of Mental Hygiene Legal Service, Fourth Department, Michael J. Hungerford, Deputy Chief Attorney, Mental Hygiene Legal Services, Fourth Department, Janine E. Rella, Principal Attorney, Mental Hygiene Legal Services, Fourth Department and others
Brooks v. Hogan
as 21-1571
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard P. Miraglia, Former Associate Commissioner, OMH, Anthony Gonzalez, Director of Risk Management, Central New York Psychiatric Center, Michael Larkin, SCTA-2; Office of Mental Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Brooks
Defendant:
Janine E. Rella, Principal Attorney, Mental Hygiene Legal Services, Fourth Department, Dr. Kumar Bahl, Psychiatrist, Central New York Psychiatric Center, Craig P. Schlanger, Senior Attorney, Mental Hygiene Legal Services, Fourth Department and others
Brooks v. Hogan
as 20-1779
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard P. Miraglia, Former Associate Commissioner, OMH, Anthony Gonzalez, Director of Risk Management, Central New York Psychiatric Center, Michael Larkin, SCTA-2; Office of Mental Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Brooks
Defendant:
Janine E. Rella, Principal Attorney, Mental Hygiene Legal Services, Fourth Department, Dr. Kumar Bahl, Psychiatrist, Central New York Psychiatric Center, Craig P. Schlanger, Senior Attorney, Mental Hygiene Legal Services, Fourth Department and others
Brooks v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2017cv00585
Plaintiff:
Charles Brooks
Defendant:
Anne Marie T. Sullivan, Donna Hall, Christopher Kunkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Groves v. Davis et al
as 9:2011cv01317
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Carl Groves, Sr.
Defendant:
Brett Davis, David W. Sill, Thomas Nicolette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
