Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Wiggins v. Child Support Division et al
as 1:2019cv00541
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Wiggins
Defendant:
Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr., El Paso Domestic Relations Office, Antonio Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, as Successor-In-Interest to Bank of America, N.A., as Trustee for the Registered Holders of GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, Commercial Mortgage Pass- v. Nesbitt Bellevue Property LLC et al
as 1:2012mc00044
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, as Successor-In-Interest to Bank of America, N.A., as Trustee for the Registered Holders of GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, Commercial Mortgage Pass
Defendant:
Nesbitt Bellevue Property LLC, Nesbitt Blue Ash Property LLC, Nesbitt Colorado Springs Property LLC and others
Receiver:
FTI Consulting, Inc.
U.S. Bank National Association v. Nesbitt Bellevue Property LLC et al
as 1:2012mc00045
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Nesbitt Bellevue Property LLC, Nesbitt Blue Ash Property LLC, Nesbitt Colorado Springs Property LLC and others
Roof Toppers of El Paso, Inc. v. Ruhl et al
as 1:2012cv00794
Plaintiff:
Roof Toppers of El Paso, Inc.
Defendant:
Patrick Ruhl, El Paso Communtiy College and Weatherproofing Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
U.S. Bank National Association, in its Capacity as Trustee for the Registered Holders of LB-UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2006-C7, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-C7 v. Birmingham USPS, LLC et al
as 1:2012mc00028
Receiver:
G. Richard Gray
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association, in its Capacity as Trustee for the Registered Holders of LB-UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2006-C7, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-C7
Defendant:
Birmingham USPS, LLC, Douglas Customs, LLC, Sierra Vista De, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
