Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Diez v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
James Logan Diez
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Warden Jerry Sanchez, Elbert Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarmon v. Comal County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Ersala Jarmon
Defendant:
Comal County Jail, Sheriff Mark Reynolds, Officer FNU Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Elbert Earl Bailey
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Thomas v. Amonett et al
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Sr. Warden Adrian Amonett, Elbert Holmes, Deputy Warden Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Flores et al
as 2:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Albert Shane Lester
Defendant:
Steven A Flores, Elbert Holmes and Candice G Flannel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Holmes et al
as 2:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Warden Elbert Holmes, Deputy Warden Placido Samaniego, Dr Issac Kwarteng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Texas Dept of Criminal Justice et al
as 2:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas
Defendant:
Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Flannel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. O'Daniel et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Rodney Johnson
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel, Bryan Collier, Billy Hirsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Jasso et al
as 2:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Abel Jasso, Luiz Garcia, Elbert Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Nino et al
as 2:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Andrew Nino, Gage Rivas, Matthew Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
