Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Brown v. Anderson, et al.
as 25-4133
Plaintiff: GREGORY TYREE BROWN
Defendant: TERRY ANDERSON, in their individual and official capacities, DALE CALDWELL, in their individual and official capacities, DONALD DUNCAN and others
Maria Moe v. Donald Trump, et al
as 25-5215
Plaintiff: Maria Moe
Defendant: Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States, Pamela J. Bondi, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, William K. Marshall, III, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Amicus Curiae: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of California, State of Illinois and others
Jane Jones, et al v. Pamela Bondi, et al
as 25-5210
Plaintiff: Jane Jones, Amy Jones, Donna Jones and others
Defendant: Pamela Bondi, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, William K. Marshall, III, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and William Lothrop, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Amicus Curiae: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of California, State of Illinois and others
Jane Doe, et al v. Pamela Bondi, et al
as 25-5213
Plaintiff: Jane Doe, Mary Doe and Sara Doe
Defendant: Pamela Bondi, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, William K. Marshall, III, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and William Lothrop, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Amicus Curiae: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of California, State of Illinois and others
Maria Moe v. Donald J. Trump, et al
as 25-5108
Unknown: In re: Sealed Case
Plaintiff: Maria Moe
Defendant: Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States, Pamela Bondi, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, William Lothrop, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Amicus Curiae: Margo Schlanger, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of California and others
Jane Jones, et al v. Pamela Bondi, et al
as 25-5101
Plaintiff: Jane Jones, Amy Jones, Donna Jones and others
Defendant: Pamela Bondi, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, William Lothrop, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and William K. Marshall, III, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Amicus Curiae: Margo Schlanger, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of California and others
Jane Doe, et al v. Pamela Bondi, et al
as 25-5099
Plaintiff: Jane Doe, Mary Doe and Sara Doe
Defendant: Pamela Bondi, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, William Lothrop, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and William K. Marshall, III, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Amicus Curiae: State of Idaho, State of Indiana, State of Alabama and others
Brown v. Morgan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv05146
Plaintiff: Gregory Tyree Brown
Defendant: Donald Holbrook, Cus Addamire, Ron Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Brown v. Richard Morgan, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-35884
Plaintiff / Appellant: GREGORY TYREE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee: RICHARD L. MORGAN, BERNARD WARNER, SCOTT FRAKES and others
Jamaal Cameron, et al v. Michael Bouchard, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1469
Plaintiff / Appellee: MATTHEW SAUNDERS, MICHAEL CAMERON, RICHARD BRIGGS and others
Defendant: MICHAEL BOUCHARD and CURTIS D. CHILDS
Defendant / Appellant: OAKLAND COUNTY, MI
Amicus Curiae: EMMITT SPARKMAN, Warden, Corrections Expert, ELDON VAIL, Corrections Expert, PHIL STANLEY, Corrections Expert and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?