Cases 1 - 10 of 1,343
Ronald Streck v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 24-1352
Plaintiff:
RONALD J. STRECK, STATE OF NEW YORK and STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Fults, Nathan v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 3:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Nathan Fults
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PDL BIOPHARMA, INC. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2023cv02289
Plaintiff:
PDL Biopharma, Inc.
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
PIRANT v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv02290
Petitioner:
JAMIL M. PIRANT
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nicholas et al v. The Independent Order of Foresters
as 1:2023cv16467
Counter Defendant:
David Nicholas and Anna Ely
Counter Claimant:
The Independent Order of Foresters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Ritchie, Lia v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 3:2023cv00797
Plaintiff:
Lia Ritchie
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ronald Streck v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 23-3035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD J. STRECK
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF TEXAS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Defendant:
ASTELLAS PHARMA US, INC. and ROCHE LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ronald J. Streck v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 23-2958
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RONALD J. STRECK
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF TEXAS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
