Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Eli Lilly and Company et al v. Apotex, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00941
Plaintiff:
Eli Lilly and Company and ICOS Corporation
Defendant:
Apotex, Inc. and Apotex Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Eli Lilly and Company et al v. Accord Healthcare, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01352
Plaintiff:
Eli Lilly and Company and ICOS Corporation
Defendant:
Accord Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Eli Lilly and Company et al v. Cipla USA, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01208
Plaintiff:
Eli Lilly and Company and ICOS Corporation
Defendant:
Cipla Limited and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Eli Lilly and Company et al v. Aurobindo Phrama Ltd. et al
as 1:2016cv01121
Plaintiff:
Eli Lilly and Company and ICOS Corporation
Defendant:
Aurobindo Phrama Ltd. and Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Eli Lilly and Company et al v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00877
Plaintiff:
Eli Lilly and Company , Eli Lilly Exports S.A. and Acrux DDS Pty Ltd.
Defendant:
Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Lupin Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ali v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 1:2014cv01615
Plaintiff:
Janine Ali
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hagan-Brown v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 1:2014cv01614
Plaintiff:
Gilda Hagan-Brown
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Eli Lilly and Company v. Kappos et al
as 1:2012cv01491
Plaintiff:
Eli Lilly and Company
Defendant:
David J. Kappos and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Eli Lilly and Company v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01396
Plaintiff:
Eli Lilly and Company
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
