Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hannon v. Loughlin et al
as 3:2017cv07236
Plaintiff:
George J. Hannon
Defendant:
Michael J. Loughlin, Timothy J. Sloan, John G. Stumpf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Public School Teachers' Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago v. Stumpf et al
as 3:2016cv07089
Defendant:
John G. Stumpf, Susan E. Engel, Michael J. Loughlin and others
Plaintiff:
Public School Teachers' Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
George Hannon v. Michael J Loughlin et al
as 3:2016cv06624
Plaintiff:
George Hannon
Defendant:
Michael J. Loughlin, Timothy J. Sloan, John G. Stumpf and others
Movant:
The City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Elson v. Stumpf, et al.,
as 4:2016cv05817
Plaintiff:
Elson and Robert Elson
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO & COMPAY, Stumpf,, John G. Stumpf and others
Petitioner:
The City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Elson v. Stumpf, et al.,
as 3:2016cv05817
Plaintiff:
Robert Elson
Defendant:
John G. Stumpf, Carrie Tolstedt, John D. Baker, II and others
Movant:
The City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. Loughlin et al
as 4:2016cv05592
Plaintiff:
Cook, Police & Fire Retirement System City of Detroit, Public School Teachers' Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago and others
Defendant:
Loughlin, Suzanne M. Vautrinot, John R. Shrewsberry and others
Petitioner:
The City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Cook v. Loughlin et al
as 3:2016cv05592
Plaintiff:
Amy Cook
Defendant:
Michael J. Loughlin, Timothy J. Sloan, John G. Stumpf and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Shaev v. Baker, II et al
as 3:2016cv05541
Plaintiff:
Victoria Shaev
Defendant:
John D. Baker, II, Elaine L. Chao, John S. Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
