Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Omar Gay v. Jennifer Shaffer, et al
as 20-15249
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH ALLEN, TIMOTHY O'HARA, JENNIFER SHAFFER, Secretary, Board of Parole Hearings and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OMAR SHARRIEFF GAY
(PC) Gay v. Shaffer
as 2:2019cv01471
Defendant:
Timothy O'Hara, Kenneth Allen, Elizabeth Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Sharrieff Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Omar Sharrieff Gay v. Jennifer Shaffer
as 2:2019cv06402
Defendant:
Timothy O'Hara, Kenneth Allen, Elizabeth Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Sharrieff Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00891
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shawn Hawk v. CDCR, et al
as 16-16885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN HAWK
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, FORENSIC ASSESSMENT DIVISION and others
Rosser v. Schaffer et al
as 1:2016cv01342
Plaintiff:
Larry Rosser
Defendant:
Jennifer Schaffer, Elizabeth Richardson, Patricia Cassady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawk v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2015cv02529
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hawk
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Board of Parole Hearings, Forensic Assessment Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawk v. Brown, et al.
as 2:2015cv01548
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hawk
Defendant:
Edmund Brown, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Board of Prison Hearings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maimona v. Board of Prison Terms et al
as 3:2009cv00264
Petitioner:
Daniel Maimona
Respondent:
Board of Prison Terms, Elizabeth Richardson and Sandra Bryson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.