Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Hafner v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2023cv01859
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Ellen Rosenblum, Tina Kotek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2023cv00951
Plaintiff:
James Ervin Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Governor Tina Kotek, Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv00783
Petitioner:
Jeani Elyse Baker and Jeani Elyse Marlatt
Respondent:
Superintendent Nicole Brown and Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortega v. Rosenblum et al
as 3:2023cv00125
Petitioner:
Michael Ortega
Respondent:
Ellen Rosenblum and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pearson v. Fhuere et al
as 6:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Chad Samuel William Pearson
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere, Attorney General of the State of Oregon and Ellen Rosenblum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willis v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2021cv01882
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Mike Schmidt, Oregon Att. Gen. Offc., Ellen Rosenblum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cuevas v. Brown et al
as 2:2021cv01688
Plaintiff:
Santos Cuevas
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Jesse Wm. Barton, Ellen Rosenblum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brenner v. Rosenblum
as 3:2021cv01082
Petitioner:
Lanny Earl Brenner
Respondent:
Ellen Rosenblum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moret v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2021cv00477
Defendant:
Channing Bennett, State of Oregon, James Egan and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Moret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Finn et al
as 6:2021cv00078
Plaintiff:
Tariq Muhammad
Defendant:
Ellen Rosenblum, Finn and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
