Cases 31 - 40 of 222
Ellis v. USA
as 1:2022cv00334
Petitioner:
Kevin Vincent Ellis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Smith v. Cain et al
as 3:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Burl Cain, Lieutenant Wten, Mr. Reynolds and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Coker et al
as 1:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Keith Dixon
Defendant:
Ellis J. Coker, Jr. and ACW Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Wheeler v. Ellis
as 5:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Barbara D. Wheeler
Defendant:
Nancy Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Upshaw et al v. Ellis et al
as 3:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Antionella Upshaw and Cedric Upshaw
Defendant:
Ward Ellis, Safeco Insurance Company of America and Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Collins et al v. Ellis
as 5:2021cv00019
Plaintiff:
Shandra Collins, Brayondra Jefferson and Kimberly Davis
Defendant:
Alexander Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. King et al
as 3:2021cv00046
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Ellis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Warden W. K. Banks, Superintendent Ronald King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Morgan et al
as 3:2021cv00047
Defendant:
Nurse Unknown Robinson, MS Department of Corrections, Warden W. K. Banks and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Ellis, Sr.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brassfield v. Frost et al
as 1:2021cv00021
Defendant:
S. Lockart, Anton Ellis, Vanessa Mitchell and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Undraneckio Brassfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Hall et al
as 1:2020cv00277
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Ellis
Defendant:
Mike Hatten, Pelicia Hall, Unknown Thomas and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
