Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Blackburn et al v. A.C. Israel Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Sherry Blackburn, Willie Rose, Elwood Bumbray and others
Defendant:
A.C. Israel Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Ingleside Investors, Richard Investors, LLC, Greg Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
George Hengle v. Sherry Treppa
as 20-1359
Defendant / Appellant:
SHERRY TREPPA, Chairperson of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Counsil; in her official capacity, AIMEE JACKSON-PENN, Member-At-Large of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, KATHLEEN TREPPA, Treasurer of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUE COLLINS, LAWRENCE MWETHUKU, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, TIFFANI MYERS and others
Defendant:
SCOTT ASNER and JOSHUA LANDY
George Hengle v. Scott Asner
as 20-1358
Defendant:
AMBER JACKSON, Member-At-Large of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, KATHLEEN TREPPA, Treasurer of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, TRACEY TREPPA, Vice-Chairperson of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUE COLLINS, LAWRENCE MWETHUKU, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, TIFFANI MYERS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSHUA LANDY and SCOTT ASNER
Sherry Treppa v. George Hengle
as 20-164
Respondent:
LAWRENCE MWETHUKU, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, WILLIE ROSE, STEVEN PIKE and others
Petitioner:
AIMEE JACKSON-PENN, Member-At-Large of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, SHERRY TREPPA, Chairperson of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Counsil; in her official capacity, AMBER JACKSON, Member-At-Large of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity and others
Scott Asner v. George Hengle
as 20-161
Respondent:
LAWRENCE MWETHUKU, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, WILLIE ROSE, STEVEN PIKE and others
Petitioner:
JOSHUA LANDY and SCOTT ASNER
George Hengle v. Scott Asner
as 20-1063
Defendant:
AMBER JACKSON, Member-At-Large of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, KATHLEEN TREPPA, Treasurer of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, TRACEY TREPPA, Vice-Chairperson of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUE COLLINS, LAWRENCE MWETHUKU, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, TIFFANI MYERS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSHUA LANDY and SCOTT ASNER
George Hengle v. Sherry Treppa
as 20-1062
Defendant / Appellant:
SHERRY TREPPA, Chairperson of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Counsil; in her official capacity, AIMEE JACKSON-PENN, Member-At-Large of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, KATHLEEN TREPPA, Treasurer of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUE COLLINS, LAWRENCE MWETHUKU, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, TIFFANI MYERS and others
Defendant:
SCOTT ASNER and JOSHUA LANDY
Hengle et al v. Asner et al
as 3:2019cv00250
Defendant:
Majestic Lake Financial, Inc.,, Richard Moseley, Jr., Upper Lake Processing Service, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sue Collins, Tiffani Myers, George Hengle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gillam et al v. Koetting et al
as 3:2018cv00473
Plaintiff:
Christine Gillam, Denis Geter, Semetrica Shadwick and others
Defendant:
Clear Loan Solutions, LLC, Rock Hill Consulting, LLC, Green Gate Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
