Cases 1 - 10 of 397
Gomez v. Gonzalez #3965 et al
as 3:2023cv02026
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dawel Gomez
Defendant:
Emilio Gonzalez #3965 and San Diego Central Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00839
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv05278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Belen Cabaccang, et al v. The United States Citizenship, et al
as 09-56089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BELEN CABACCANG and ISIDRO CABACCANG
Defendant - Appellee:
THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, EVELYN M. UPCHURCH, Director of CIS Texas Service Center, MICHAEL AYTES, Action Deputy Director of CIS and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, EMILIO GONZALEZ, Director of CIS and ROARK L. DAVID, Director of CIS Texas Service Center
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-56019
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Singh v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2009cv00164
Plaintiff:
Narvinder Singh
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez, David Still and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SINGH v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2009at00061
Plaintiff:
NAVINDER SINGH
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez, David Still and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
