Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. NRC, et al
as 20-1019
Intervenor: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC, Holtec Pilgrim, LLC, formerly known as Entergy Nuclear Generation Company, LLC and others
Respondent: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America
Petitioner: Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC et al v. Perales
as 1:2016cv00051
Plaintiff: Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC , Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Defendant: Cesar A. Perales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of Vermont, et al v. NRC, et al
as 15-1279
Petitioner: State of Vermont, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation and Green Mountain Power Corporation
Respondent: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Entergy Nuclear Fitzpatrick, LLC et al v. Zibelman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00230
Plaintiff: Entergy Nuclear Fitzpatrick, LLC , Entergy Nuclear Power Marketing, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Defendant: Audrey Zibelman , Patricia L. Acampora , Diane X. Burman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beyond Nuclear, Inc., et al v. NRC, et al
as 14-1216
Petitioner: Beyond Nuclear, Inc., Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League, Inc., Missouri Coalition for the Environment, Inc. and others
Respondent: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Nuclear Energy Institute, Inc., Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. and Northern States Power Company
Entergy Services, Inc. et al v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 2:2014cv01524
Plaintiff: Entergy Services, Inc. , Entergy Mississippi Inc. , Entergy Texas, Inc. and others
Defendant: United States Department of Labor, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Thomas E. Perez and others
Consol_plaintiff: United States of America
Consol_defendant: Entergy Corporation, Entergy Services, Inc., Entergy Mississippi Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC et al v. Shumlin et al
as 5:2013cv00064
Plaintiff: Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Defendant: Peter Shumlin , William Sorrell , James Volz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee v. Shumlin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-4659
Plaintiff - Appellant: Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: Peter Shumlin, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Vermont, William Sorrell, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Vermont and Mary N. Peterson
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee v. Shumlin
as 12-791
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant: Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: Peter Shumlin, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Vermont, William Sorrell, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Vermont, James Volz, in his official capacity as a member of the Vermont Public Service Board and others
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee v. Shumlin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-707
Plaintiff - Appellee: Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant: Peter Shumlin, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Vermont, William Sorrell, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Vermont, James Volz, in his official capacity as a member of the Vermont Public Service Board and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?