Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Samuels v. Wagner et al
as 3:2020cv00981
Defendant:
Dennis Wagner, Dennis Wagner Enterprises LLC and Dennis Wagner Enterprises LLC doing business as Dennis R Wager Enterprises LLC
Plaintiff:
Eboni Dee Samuels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wells v. 8 Figure Dream Lifestyle, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00786
Defendant:
Jerrold Maurer, Alex Dowlatshahi, 8 Figure Dream Lifestyle, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Brett W. Wells
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans With Disabilities Act
LKS Enterprises, LLC v. City of Silverton et al
as 6:2016cv00785
Defendant:
City of Silverton and Daryl Jones
Plaintiff:
LKS Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02401
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Wong et al v. Colvin et al
as 3:2013cv02209
Defendant:
Barnsley Enterprise LLC, Carolyn W. Colvin, Disability Law Office NW, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Bernath and Martha Wong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Speed's Auto Services Group, Inc. et al v. City of Portland, Oregon et al
as 3:2012cv00738
Defendant:
City of Portland Revenue Bureau, City of Portland, Oregon, Thomas W Lannom and others
Plaintiff:
Fiesta Enterprises, LLC and Speed's Auto Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
