Cases 21 - 30 of 179
National Parks Conservation, et al v. EPA, et al
as 20-1517
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
Environmental Defense Fund, Sierra Club and National Parks Conservation Association
National Parks Conservation As, et al v. EPA, et al
as 20-1518
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
Environmental Defense Fund, Sierra Club and National Parks Conservation Association
State of Wyoming, et al v. DOI, et al
as 20-8073
Intervenor:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EARTHWORKS, STATE OF NEW MEXICO and others
Respondent:
WESTERN ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCE COUNCILS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, MICHAEL D. NEDD, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Bureau of Land Management and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Petitioner:
STATE OF WYOMING, STATE OF MONTANA, INDEPENDANT PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others
State of Wyoming, et al v. DOI, et al
as 20-8072
Intervenor:
SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as United States Department of Interior Secretary, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Petitioner:
STATE OF WYOMING, STATE OF MONTANA, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Environmental Defense Fund, et al v. FERC
as 20-3032
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Petitioner:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, SIERRA CLUB, NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
National Parks Conservation, et al v. EPA, et al
as 20-60929
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
Environmental Defense Fund, Sierra Club and National Parks Conservation Association
National Parks Conservation As, et al v. EPA, et al
as 20-1408
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
Environmental Defense Fund, Sierra Club and National Parks Conservation Association
California Air Resources Board, et al v. American Petroleum Institute, et al
as 20-16801
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior;, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FORT BERTHOLD PROTECTORS OF WATER AND EARTH RIGHTS, CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, WESTERN ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCE COUNCILS and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING, INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE and others
California Air Resources Board, et al v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 20-16794
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior;, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FORT BERTHOLD PROTECTORS OF WATER AND EARTH RIGHTS, CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, WESTERN ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCE COUNCILS and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
California Air Resources Board, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-16793
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FORT BERTHOLD PROTECTORS OF WATER AND EARTH RIGHTS, CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, WESTERN ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCE COUNCILS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior;, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
