Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tri Huynh v. Walmart, Inc., et al
as 22-16188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRI MINH HUYNH
Defendant / Appellee:
WALMART, INC., A Delaware corporation, DOUG MCMILLON, BRETT BIGGS and others
Defendant:
WAL-MART.COM USA LLC, RACHEL BRAND, GREGORY B. PENNER and others
Liberty Insurance Underwriters Inc. v. Epiq Ediscovery Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2020cv10025
Plaintiff:
Liberty Insurance Underwriters Inc.
Defendant:
Epiq Ediscovery Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Document Technologies, Inc. v. West
as 17-2659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Document Technologies, Inc., Epiq Systems, Inc. and Epiq Ediscovery Solutions, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
LDiscovery, LLC and Christopher Weiler
Defendant:
John Parker, Seth Kreger, Mark Hosford and others
Document Technologies, Inc. et al v. Hosford
as 1:2017cv03917
Plaintiff:
Document Technologies Inc. , Epiq Systems and Epiq Ediscovery Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark Hosford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Document Technologies, Inc. et al v. LDiscovery, LLC
as 1:2017cv03433
Plaintiff:
Document Technologies Inc. , Eqip Systems, Inc. and Epiq Ediscovery Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
LDiscovery, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Document Technologies, Inc. et al v. Hosford
as 1:2017cv02586
Plaintiff:
Document Technologies, Inc. , Epiq Systems and Epiq eDiscovery Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark Hosford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Document Technologies, Inc. et al v. LDiscovery, LLC
as 1:2017cv00405
Plaintiff:
Document Technologies, Inc. , Epiq Systems, Inc. and Epiq Ediscovery Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
LDiscovery, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Document Technologies, Inc. et al v. West et al
as 1:2017cv02405
Plaintiff:
Document Technologies, Inc. , Epiq Systems, Inc. and Epiq Ediscovery Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Steven West , John Parker and Seth Kreger
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
