Cases 1 - 10 of 21
TATUM v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TATUM
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, METROPOLITAN POLICE, DANIEL THAU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HALL et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS
as 1:2023cv01261
Plaintiff:
STACIA HALL, RALPH CHITTAMS, SUZZANNE KELLER and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Amicus Curiae:
LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW and WASHINGTON LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS AND URBAN AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
EPPS v. THE CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC.
as 1:2020cv02519
Defendant:
CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC.
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J. EPPS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EPPS v. LEW
as 1:2015cv00834
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM EPPS
Defendant:
JACOB J. LEW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURAND v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2013cv01346
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , CATHY A. LANIER , DIANA HAINES-WALTON and others
Plaintiff:
GARY DURAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EPPS v. GRAY et al
as 1:2013cv01126
Plaintiff:
LARRY DARNELL EPPS
Defendant:
VINCENT GRAY, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AUTHORITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EPPS v. TRIPP et al
as 1:2012cv02062
Petitioner:
LARRY DARNELL EPPS
Respondent:
BRICK TRIPP and ISSAC FULWOOD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
