Cases 1 - 10 of 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Gray v. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 4:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
David B. Gray
Defendant:
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. RSPS HOLDINGS LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Defendant:
RSPS HOLDINGS LLC and SRS MILLEDGEVILLE LLC doing business as SHANE'S RIB SHACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sanam Conyers Lodging, LLC
as 1:2023mi00110
Plaintiff:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent:
Sanam Conyers Lodging, LLC doing business as Microtel Inn and Suites
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
