Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Emerald Equipment Systems, Inc. v. Victory Gardens, Inc.
as 5:2022cv01332
Plaintiff:
Emerald Equipment Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Victory Gardens, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
In Re: Grupo Televisa Securiti
as 21-1499
Respondent:
Melvin Gross, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Arrowstreet Capital LP, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. and others
Petitioner:
Palm Tran, Inc. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1577 Pension Plan, Individually and on behalf of the certified class, Gilardi & Co., LLC, Colleges of Applied Arts and Technology Pension Plan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Securities and Procedure Scholars, City of Dearborn Heights Police and Fire Retirement System, City of Grand Rapids General Employees Retirement System and others
Emerald Equipment Systems, Inc. v. Quarry Management Holdings, LLC
as 5:2020cv01422
Plaintiff:
Emerald Equipment Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Quarry Management Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
MMG Insurance Company v. Unisource Food Equipment Systems Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00177
Plaintiff:
MMG Insurance Company
Defendant:
Unisource Food Equipment Systems Inc. and Ronald Mondello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Metso Minerals Inc. v. Terex Corporation
as 14-1352
Defendant / Appellee:
TEREX CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
METSO MINERALS INC.
Defendant:
POWERSCREEN INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTION LIMITED, EMERALD EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS, INC. and POWERSCREEN NEW YORK, INC.
Marine Travelift, Inc. v. Marine Lift Systems, Inc.
as 8:2012mc00007
Plaintiff:
Marine Travelift, Inc.
Defendant:
Marine Lift Systems, Inc.
Movant:
Harris Equipment Systems, Inc.
Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International
as 11-1572
Plaintiff / Appellee:
METSO MINERALS, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
TEREX CORPORATION, EMERALD EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS, INC., POWERSCREEN NEW YORK, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
