Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Homosassa Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 5:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
Homosassa Water District and Homosassa Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Albertson Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv02406
Plaintiff:
Albertson Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Town of Huntington/Dix Hills Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv02405
Plaintiff:
Town of Huntington/Dix Hills Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
City of Greenlawn Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv02407
Plaintiff:
City of Greenlawn Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
City of Glen Clove Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv02403
Plaintiff:
City of Glen Clove Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 06-41574
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
The City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2004cv03417
Defendant:
El Paso CGP Company doing business as Coastal Oil New York, Inc. formerly known as Coastal Corporation, TRMI Holdings Inc., Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Water Finance Agency, The Water Board and The City of New York
Petitioner:
Gary Stumpf, Thomas M Milton, Meena Nainan and others
Material Witne:
Barker Hamill
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Equistar Chemicals v. Joseph Edward Co Inc, et al
as 4:2001cv02495
Plaintiff:
Equistar Chemicals LP
Defendant:
Joseph Edward Company Inc and Dale E Zdolshek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2000cv01898
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs, American Distilling & Manufacturing Co., Inc., Melanie J. Arcure and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Coastal Oil New England, Inc., Getty Properties Corp. and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Citgo Petroleum Corporation, Kewanee Industries Inc., Chevron Puerto Rico LLC and others
Defendant:
Citgo Refining and Chemical Company, L.P., Citgo Refining and Chemicals Company L.P., Coastal Eagle Point Oil Company and others
Cross Claimant:
El Paso Corporation, Lyondell Chemical Company, Ultramar Energy, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Flint Hills Resources, LP, Claudia Christiansen and Hamner institutes for health science, the
4Th Party Plaintiff:
Northville Industries Corp.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Town of Kouts, United Water New York, Inc. and Village of Bethalto
Consolidated Defendant:
Valero Refining Company Texas, L.P., Ashland, Inc., Exxon Mobil Oil Coroporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
A&A McHenry, Inc., Chestnut Mart of Newburgh, Inc., Chestnut Petroleum Dist., Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, American Refining Group Inc.'s, Buckley Energy Group, Ltd. and others
4Th Party Defendant:
Ibrahim Aykanat, George Chapklin, Jr., Stephen Chapklin and others
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges, Kenneth E. Warner, Kieran Gostin and others
Appellant:
The State of New Hampshire
Intervenor:
United States
Not Classified By Court:
Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
