Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Ruppert v. Bravo, et al
as 11-2144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES KEVIN RUPPERT
Defendant - Appellee:
ERASMO BRAVO, Warden, J. TORELLO, Job Coordinator, RODGERS, Ms., Lieutenant, Grievance Officer, Disciplinary Officer and others
Finnell v. Bravo et al
as 1:2011cv00621
Petitioner:
Walter Scott Finnell
Respondent:
Erasmo Bravo, State of New Mexico Adult Parole Board and Gary K King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James v. Bravo et al
as 1:2011cv00505
Plaintiff:
Brenden James
Defendant:
Erasmo Bravo and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Santiago v. Bravo et al
as 1:2011cv00488
Plaintiff:
Pablo Giovanni Santiago
Defendant:
Erasmo Bravo and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gallegos v. Bravo, et al
as 11-2093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST GALLEGOS
Defendant - Appellee:
ERASMO BRAVO, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Rousseau v. Bravo
as 1:2011cv00355
Petitioner:
Otto Rousseau
Respondent:
Erasmo Bravo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holt v. Bravo, et al
as 11-2060
Petitioner - Appellant:
JIMMY J. HOLT
Respondent - Appellee:
ERASMO BRAVO, Warden of Guadalupe County Detention Center and GARY KING, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Bryant v. Guadalupe County Correctional Facility
as 1:2011cv00197
Petitioner:
Robert L Bryant
Respondent:
Guadalupe County Correctional Facility , Erasmo Bravo and Department of Corrections of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Almager v. Bravo et al
as 1:2011cv00162
Petitioner:
Esmeregildo Almager
Respondent:
Erasmo Bravo and The Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lucero v. Bravo et al
as 1:2011cv00163
Petitioner:
Joseph P Lucero
Respondent:
Erasmo Bravo and The Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
