Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Aicher v. Allcorn et al
as 1:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
Eric Aicher
Defendant:
Ardith Allcorn and Mary James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Aicher v. Hatch
as 1:2022cv00945
Petitioner:
Eric Aicher
Respondent:
FNU Hatch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Aicher v. New Mexico Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Eric Aicher
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network LLC, New Mexico Corrections Department, John/Jane Does 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aicher v. Sarracino, et al
as 1:2021cv00347
Plaintiff:
Eric Aicher
Defendant:
Janel Sarracino and Doe John/Jane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aicher v. Keefe Commissary Network, et al
as 19-2055
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MIKE SILVA, JOHN DOE NUMBERS 1-100, LT. GRIEVANCE OFFICER JAMES BEATTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC AICHER
Aicher v. Keefe Commissary Network LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00539
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network LLC , James Beatty , Mike Silva and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Aicher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aicher v. New Mexico Department of Corrections, et al
as 1:2018cv00474
Plaintiff:
Eric Aicher
Defendant:
New Mexico Department of Corrections, The GEO Group, Inc. and Corizon Health Care
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aicher v. The GEO Group Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00282
Plaintiff:
Eric Aicher
Defendant:
The GEO Group Inc., Corizon Health Care and New Mexico Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aicher v. N.M. Department of Corrections
as 1:2016cv00914
Plaintiff:
Eric Aicher
Defendant:
NM Department of Corrections, John Doe, Access Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aicher v. Ali et al
as 2:2015cv00552
Plaintiff:
Eric Aicher
Defendant:
A. Ali, Access Corrections, J. Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
