Cases 11 - 20 of 1,456
Kateryna Komashko v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-1404
Petitioner:
KATERYNA KOMASHKO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Kinyam Tewelikum v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-1398
Petitioner:
KINYAM JUDE TEWELIKUM
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Kenneth Nketsiah v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-1397
Petitioner:
KENNETH EKOW NKETSIAH
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Keenan Cofield v. Corizon, Incorporated
as 15-6549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEENAN KESTER COFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON, INCORPORATED, f/k/a Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated, Its Director/Owners, State & Federal Medical Service Provider, CONTRACT SPECIALIST TO STATE OF MARYLAND, MAYOR MARTIN O'MALLEY, Governor, State of Maryland, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Individual and Official Capacity, GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, Administrator, U.S. MARSHALL and others
June Budiarto v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-1370
Petitioner:
JUNE BUDIARTO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Odette Tienmeni v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-1363
Petitioner:
ODETTE TIENMENI
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Anastasiya Krushevskaya v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-1366
Petitioner:
ANASTASIYA KRUSHEVSKAYA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Bassam Hanna v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-1365
Petitioner:
BASSAM GERGES HANNA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Hummingbird Credit Counseling And Education, Inc. v. Holder, Jr.
as 5:2015cv00148
Plaintiff:
Hummingbird Credit Counseling And Education, Inc.
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551
Hector Escobar v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-1356
Petitioner:
HECTOR RAMON ESCOBAR, a/k/a Hector Escobar Escobar
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.