Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Barker v. New York City Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv08903
Plaintiff:
Marc Barker
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections, Ogburn, Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rivera v. Ramos et al
as 1:2013cv07785
Plaintiff:
Orlando Rivera
Defendant:
Eric Ramos, Simpson and Mundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv06286
Plaintiff:
John Daniels
Defendant:
City of New York , New York City Department of Correction (DOC) , Carlton Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manley v. Ramos et al
as 1:2013cv02662
Plaintiff:
Tony Manley
Defendant:
Eric Ramos, Moore and Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Mainstay Business Solutions et al
as 1:2013cv01802
Plaintiff:
Seth D. Harris
Defendant:
Mainstay Business Solutions , Blue Lake Rancheria Economic Development Corporation , Blue Lake Rancheria and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ghee v. Ramos
as 1:2013cv00632
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ghee
Defendant:
Eric Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michel v. New York City Department of Correction et al
as 1:2012cv05701
Plaintiff:
Donald Michel
Defendant:
New York City Department of Correction, Jason Thompson, John Mundy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michel v. New York City Department of Correction et al
as 7:2012cv05701
Plaintiff:
Donald Michel
Defendant:
New York City Department of Correction, Jason Thompson, John Mundy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William v. Ramos et al
as 1:2012cv05692
Plaintiff:
Rahim William
Defendant:
Eric Ramos, Michael Litunts, Captain Earl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Ramos et al
as 1:2012cv05302
Plaintiff:
Oscar Lee Sanders, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Ramos, Declet, Prez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
