Cases 31 - 40 of 99
Adel Ghanem v. Warden Essex County Correction
as 20-1988
Defendant / Appellant:
WARDEN ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ADEL SULTAN MOHAMMED GHANEM
Anthony Auriemma v. Bloomfield Municipal Court, et al
as 20-1819
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY FEE ARBITRATION, ESSEX COUNTY ETHICS COMMITTEE, ESSEX COUNTY LANDLORD TENANT COURT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY AURIEMMA
Jose Nieves v. Essex County Correctional Faci, et al
as 20-1482
Defendant:
GWEN, Supervisor, NURSE MARIA, and other unknown staff of April 6, 2014 and ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Defendant / Appellee:
FLAUHARDY, Correctional Officer and JACKSON, Correctional Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE L. NIEVES
In re: Tobia Ippolito
as 20-1370
Petitioner:
In re: TOBIA IPPOLITO
Respondent:
MARTHA HILDEBRADT, ESQ., in her Official Capacity as Assistant U.S. Trustee, CLIFFORD J. WHITE, III, in his Official Capacity as Director of United States Trustee Program, CRAIG CARPENITO, in his Official Capacity as United States Attorney District of New Jersey and others
Snyder v. Essex County Probation
as 20-1019
Respondent / Appellee:
ESSEX COUNTY PROBATION
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOANNA M. SNYDER
Fernandez v. Blodgett
as 20-1006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAZARO FERNANDEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
JONATHAN W. BLODGETT, Essex County District Attorney
In re: Rashaun Barkley
as 19-3381
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ESSEX COUNTY
Petitioner:
In re: RASHAUN BARKLEY
Malcom Haynes v. Warden Essex County Correction
as 19-3288
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MALCOM ANTHONY HAYNES
Defendant / Appellant:
WARDEN ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Kabine Fofana v. Warden Essex County Correction, et al
as 19-2890
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KABINE FOFANA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
