Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00173
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00136
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00306
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Owens v. Donatto et al
as 4:2022cv01685
Plaintiff:
Christian Owens
Defendant:
Donatto, Rhoades, Huey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Warden et al
as 4:2022cv01372
Petitioner:
Gilberto R. Estrada Perez
Respondent:
Warden and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estrada-Alvarez v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv01008
Petitioner:
Teodoro Estrada-Alvarez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WOODHOUSE v. SPEARMAN et al
as 2:2022cv01208
Plaintiff:
SHEILA WOODHOUSE
Defendant:
ALLEN SPEARMAN, All HVAC and Electrical LLC, LUIS ESTRADA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Estrada v. Litz et al
as 3:2021cv01955
Plaintiff:
Antonio Estrada
Defendant:
Tina Litz, Michael L. Ott, A. Rebecca Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORMANDY INSURANCE COMPANY v. IMMEDIATE MEDICAL STAFFING NJ INC. et al
as 2:2021cv05053
Plaintiff:
NORMANDY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
IMMEDIATE MEDICAL STAFFING NJ INC. and FRIDA GODINEZ ESTRADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
