Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Eugene Oak v. Michael Winter, et al
as 22-55773
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EUGENE OAK
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL C. WINTER, of Illinois, FEDERAL STREETS HOLDINGS, LLC, Dissolved on by Illinois Law, DAVID ROTENBERG, of Illinois and others
Eugene Oak v. Michael C. Winter et al
as 2:2022cv00517
Defendant:
Sun Auck Park, Michael C. Winter, Federal Street Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Oak
Eugene Oak v. Michael Winter, et al
as 21-56296
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EUGENE OAK
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL C. WINTER, of Illinois, FEDERAL STREETS HOLDINGS, LLC, Dissolved on by Illinois Law, DAVID ROTENBERG, of Illinois and others
Eugene Oak v. Michael C. Winter et al
as 2:2021cv08061
Plaintiff:
Eugene Oak
Defendant:
Michael C. Winter, Federal Streets Holdings, LLC, David Rotenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eugene Oak v. Michael C. Winter et al
as 2:2021cv07036
Plaintiff:
Eugene Oak
Defendant:
Michael C. Winter, Federal Street Holdings, LLC, BBC Van Ness, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Oakes v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
as 9:2016cv80028
Defendant:
Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eugene Oakes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Mekal et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as ILS/3:13-cv-00683
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mekal , Curtis Melton , Yanbin Men and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Mekal et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2013cv00683
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mekal , Curtis Melton , Yanbin Men and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Hammett v. Oakes
as 2:2010cv00850
Plaintiff:
Lashon Monique Hammett
Defendant:
Maurice Eugene Oakes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02345
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
