Cases 1 - 10 of 21
United States of America et al v. ACF Industries, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01603
Defendant:
Evraz Inc. NA, Northwest Pipe Company, ACF Industries, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of Oregon, Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Evraz Inc. NA et al v. United States
as 1:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Evraz Inc. NA and Evraz Inc. NA Canada
Defendant:
United States
Evraz Inc. NA v. US
as 21-2181
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EVRAZ INC. NA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
Jennifer Rieman v. Evraz, Inc. NA
as 19-35617
Defendant / Appellee:
EVRAZ, INC. NA, a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JENNIFER RIEMAN
Cecil Smith v. Evraz Inc. NA
as 17-35485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECIL F. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
EVRAZ INC. NA
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation v. Air Liquide America Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00164
Defendant:
Air Liquide America Corporation, Arkema Inc., BP West Coast Products LLC and others
509) 575-1227 (fax:
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601 CERCLA Hazardous Waste Cleanup Costs
Smith v. Evraz Inc. NA
as 3:2017cv00086
Defendant:
Evraz Inc. NA
Plaintiff:
Cecil F. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Belfor Environmental, Inc. v. Evraz Inc. NA
as 1:2016cv03139
Plaintiff:
Belfor Environmental, Inc.
Defendant:
Evraz Inc. NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02264
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01888
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
