Cases 1 - 10 of 19
McDonald (ID 113183) v. Peterson et al
as 5:2021cv03060
Defendant:
Sara Beth Collins, Hazel M. Peterson and Jedediah R. Ewing
Plaintiff:
Sean E. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore (ID 85744) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv03083
Defendant:
(fnu) Ewing, Joe Norwood and Kansas Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Joshua Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewing (ID 36396) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2018cv03023
Petitioner:
Kevin Wayne Ewing
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ewing (ID 36396) v. Smartt et al
as 5:2017cv03190
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wayne Ewing
Defendant:
Jason Smartt, John J. Kisner and David Lowden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Williams v. Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2014cv03139
Plaintiff:
Larry James Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, United States Army, Monty William Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ewing v. Surrogue
as 2:2014cv02098
Plaintiff:
Madeline S. Ewing
Defendant:
Jackie Surrogue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Marquez et al
as 6:2012cv01401
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tammy L. Marquez, Antonio J. Marquez, Adam T. Ewing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
McFadden v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 2:2009cv02273
Plaintiff:
Janet Toole, Barbara McGarity, Demetria L. McFadden and others
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Kimly Coleman, Sally Hawthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
