Cases 31 - 38 of 38
ROXBERRY CREAMERY, LLC v. ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 3:2009cv00019
Plaintiff:
ROXBERRY CREAMERY, LLC
Defendant:
ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC. and ROBERTA M. BARRY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DAMAN EXPRESS INC. et al v. INTERRA INDUSTRIES, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2008cv02738
Plaintiff:
DAMAN EXPRESS INC. and DEX LOGISTICS INC.
Defendant:
INTERRA INDUSTRIES, L.L.C., SAKS & COMPANY and ABC COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. UNIVERSAL EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 2:2007mc00289
Plaintiff:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL EXPRESS, INC., RICHARD A, ALTOMARE, CHRIS G. GUNDERSON and others
Receiver:
JANE W. MOSCOWITZ
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, THE v. BATSON et al
as 2:2007cv05152
Plaintiff:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, THE
Defendant:
DELINA M. BATSON, PATRICK A. COLLIER, DIANA POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
NII BROKERAGE, L.L.C. v. ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv05125
Plaintiff:
NII BROKERAGE, L.L.C.
Defendant:
ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC., YELLOW TRANSPORTATION, INC. and AACTION FREIGHTWAYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A
LIGHTNING POKER, INC. v. ELITE EXPRESS INC.
as 2:2007cv04239
Plaintiff:
LIGHTNING POKER, INC.
Defendant:
ELITE EXPRESS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
MILLENIUM HOMES REALTY, LLC. v. ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv03895
Plaintiff:
MILLENIUM HOMES REALTY, LLC.
Defendant:
ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, ABF FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., AVERITT EXPRESS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, THE v. MID-STATES EXPRESS, INC.
as 2:2007cv01728
Plaintiff:
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, THE
Defendant:
MID-STATES EXPRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
