Cases 21 - 27 of 27
F M Tarbell Co v. A and L Partners Inc et al
as 8:2010cv01589
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A and L Partners Inc and Andrea Marquez
Counter Claimant:
A and L Partners Inc and Andrea Marquez
Defendant:
A and L Partners Inc, Bob Bennion, Bennion and Deville Fine Homes Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
F M Tarbell Co
Plaintiff:
F M Tarbell Co
ThirdParty Defendant:
Valentina Jimov-Red, Hamid Reza Kharrat and Donald M Tarbell
First Team Real Estate-Orange County v. F. M. Tarbell Co.
as 2:2010cv06392
Defendant:
F. M. Tarbell Co.
Plaintiff:
First Team Real Estate-Orange County
D.M. v. County of Riverside et al
as 2:2009cv09239
Plaintiff:
D. M.
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Eddie Fisher, A. F. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Raj Astavakra et al v. City of Diamond Bar et al
as 2:2007cv07997
Plaintiff:
Raj Astavakra, Niraj Patel, Ratan Hospitality LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Eric Red et al v. Focus Features International et al
as 2:2007cv06366
Plaintiff:
Eric Red, Eric Red, Redworks and others
Defendant:
Focus Features International, Focus Features, F/M Entertainment Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Yang, et al v. MAGEC, et al
as 1:2001cv05437
Plaintiff:
Pahog Yang , Elaine Yang , Tzong Cha and others
Defendant:
Multi-Agency Gang Enforcement Consortium, Multi-Agency Gang Enforcement Consortium Operations Commanders as of 10/98 4/00 11/00, County of Fresno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
