Cases 1 - 10 of 523
Ramirez v. Warden, FCI Big Spring
as 1:2024cv00155
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Big Spring
Petitioner:
Armando Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Berrios-Osorto v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00377
Petitioner:
Olvyn Abilo Berrios-Osorto
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bustos-Cruz v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00378
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Petitioner:
Sergio Antonio Bustos-Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hutt v. Warden-FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
Devontay Jerrod Hutt
Respondent:
Warden-FCI Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mero v. Warden FCI Texarkana
as 5:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
Vicente Santos Mero
Respondent:
Warden FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Haros v. Warden FCI La Tuna-Camp
as 3:2024cv00323
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna-Camp
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Haros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Easton v. Warden - FCI Beaumont Medium
as 1:2024cv00268
Petitioner:
Joseph Easton
Respondent:
Warden - FCI Beaumont Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fernandez v. Warden-FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00269
Respondent:
Warden-FCI Beaumont Low
Petitioner:
Leif Diaz Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Paz v. Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
as 3:2024cv00308
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
Petitioner:
Gerardo Paz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robles v. Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
as 3:2024cv00252
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
Petitioner:
Ricardo Robles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
