Cases 31 - 40 of 186
Robert Graham v. FAA
as 21-70964
Petitioner:
ROBERT L. GRAHAM
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Robert Mawhinney v. USDOL, et al
as 21-70283
Petitioner:
ROBERT STEVEN MAWHINNEY
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Robert Mawhinney v. Transport Workers Union, Local, et al
as 21-70039
Respondent:
TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION, LOCAL 591, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Petitioner:
ROBERT STEVEN MAWHINNEY
Luther Kurtz v. FAA, et al
as 20-73440
Petitioner:
LUTHER KURTZ, and Skydive Coastal California, Inc. D/B/A Phoenix Area Skydiving
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION and CITY OF CASA GRANDE
Save Our Skies LA v. FAA, et al
as 20-73314
Petitioner:
SAVE OUR SKIES LA
Respondent:
STEPHEN M. DICKSON, in his official capacity as Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration and FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Tule Lake Committee v. FAA, et al
as 20-16955
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TULE LAKE COMMITTEE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TULELAKE, PHIL FOLLIS, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION and others
Heath Fulkerson v. FCC, et al
as 20-16693
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEATH VINCENT FULKERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and others
David Blomgren v. FAA, et al
as 20-72351
Petitioner:
DAVID R. BLOMGREN
Respondent:
DANIEL K. ELWELL, Acting Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration and FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
City of Sacramento v. FAA, et al
as 20-72150
Petitioner:
CITY OF SACRAMENTO
Respondent:
STEPHEN M. DICKSON, in his official capacity as Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration and FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
