Cases 21 - 30 of 119
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mullins v. U.S. Immigration, et al
as 22-4010
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ANDREW MULLINS
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and U.S. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Mullins v. Inovar, et al
as 22-4005
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ANDREW MULLINS
Defendant / Appellee:
INOVAR, INC., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF UTAH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Mullins v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 4:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Mullins
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Walmart et al
as 2:2021cv01107
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
Walmart, Walmart Corporation and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Seven-Eleven et al
as 2:2021cv01105
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
Seven-Eleven, Curry County Adult Detention Center and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2021cv01077
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, National Security Administration, Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
