Cases 21 - 30 of 52
BRADSHAW v. GEORGIA et al
as 7:2016cv00038
Plaintiff:
SIGFRID N BRADSHAW
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, JOHN DOE, GEORGIA BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bergeron v. James et al
as 1:2016cv00535
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Defendant:
Robert J. James, David McDade, Benjamin Von Schuch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2015cv03669
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 7:2015cv00096
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 1:2015cv02065
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 4:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 3:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 1:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 1:2014cv03709
Plaintiff:
Karen Camile Watson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations and Paulding County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2014cv00182
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
