Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jane Doe v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al
as 4:2024cv01963
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), FNU Kinlaw, FNU Sinclair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2021cv00787
Plaintiff:
Mr. Keith H. Washington, San Francisco Bay View National Black Newspaper, Malik and others
Defendant:
Maria Richard, The GEO Group, Inc., William Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gimbel v. United States et al
as 3:2011cv05503
Plaintiff:
John Gimbel
Defendant:
United States, State of California, U.S. Secret Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gimbel v. United States et al
as 3:2011cv05503
Plaintiff:
John Gimbel
Defendant:
United States, State of California, U.S. Secret Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gimbel v. United States et al
as 1:2011cv05503
Plaintiff:
John Gimbel
Defendant:
United States, State of California, U.S. Secret Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin et al v. Lange et al
as 3:2010cv04551
Plaintiff:
Ronald Austin and Deborah Austin
Defendant:
Matthew Lange, Cornell Correction Center and U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin et al v. Lange et al
as 4:2010cv04551
Plaintiff:
Ronald Austin and Deborah Austin
Defendant:
Matthew Lange , Cornell Correction Center and U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jasper v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2007cv00121
Plaintiff:
Todd L. Jasper
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Department of Justice, W. Croghan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
