Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Foy v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016cv00391
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Foy
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack Hussien Obama, US Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
State of North Carolina v. FCC
as 15-1506
Petitioner:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
City of Bellevue, Washington v. City of Burlingame, California
as 15-1284
Petitioner:
CITY OF BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF MCALLEN, TEXAS and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Montgomery County, Maryland v. US
as 15-1240
Petitioner:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
National Telecommunications v. FCC
as 13-1661
Petitioner:
NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
National Telecom Coop v. FCC
as 11-2352
Petitioner:
NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
National Assn State Utility v. FCC
as 11-2347
Petitioner:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE UTILITY CONSUMER ADVOCATES
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Core Communications, Inc v. FCC
as 11-2346
Petitioner:
CORE COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mountain Area Info Network v. FCC
as 11-2036
Petitioner:
MOUNTAIN AREA INFORMATION NETWORK
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TCR Sports Broadcasting Holdin v. FCC
as 11-1151
Petitioner:
TCR SPORTS BROADCASTING HOLDING, L.L.P., d/b/a Mid-Atlantic Sports Network
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
