Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Kennedy
as 2:2023mc50089
Petitioner:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Respondent:
Lamont Kennedy
Calcutt, III v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
as 1:2021cv00990
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Harry C Calcutt III
Plaintiff:
Harry C. Calcutt, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Harry Calcutt, III v. FDIC
as 20-4303
Petitioner:
HARRY C. CALCUTT, III
Respondent:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Daniel Wollschlager v. FDIC
as 20-1536
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL WOLLSCHLAGER
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Wollschlager v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
as 2:2019cv10505
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wollschlager
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
City of Detroit v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.
as 2:2017cv12619
Plaintiff:
City of Detroit
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Amos et al
as 1:2016mc00047
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
William L. Amos and Innovation Trend Setters of America LLC
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Amos et al
as 1:2016mc00045
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
William L. Amos and Innovation Trend Setters of America LLC
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Amos et al
as 1:2016mc00048
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
William L. Amos and Innovation Trend Setters of America LLC
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al v. Amos et al
as 1:2016mc00046
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
William L. Amos and Innovation Trend Setters of America LLC
3rd_party_plaintiff:
William L. Amos
3rd_pty_defendant:
Roderick M Wright
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
