Cases 1 - 10 of 13
TORO v. ASAO et al
as 1:2020cv02282
Defendant:
DR. ROBERT CABANES, L. MOORE, J. RANGONE and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL FRANCIS TORO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MONTALVO v. US FEDERAL GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2016cv06085
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO MONTALVO
Defendant:
US FEDERAL GOVERNMENT and CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTION FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2012cv06642
Petitioner:
ROBERT LEE EDWARDS
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE TREATMENT CENTER FOR SEX OFFENDERS and (USA) FEDERAL GOVERNMENT (CORP.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SINGLETON v. U.S. et al
as 2:2011cv07487
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A. SINGLETON
Respondent:
U.S., THE CRIMINAL SYSTEMS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ALFORD v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF AMERICA
as 3:2010cv04359
Plaintiff:
KEITH E. ALFORD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv06250
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv05384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv04368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
