Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Tafari v. Rucker, et al.
as 24-2842
Plaintiff:
RAS HEZEKIAH TAFARI
Defendant:
YVETTE RUCKER, JULIE RANDALL, GARRY MOLER and others
ENDRES v. AIR CANADA, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ENDRES
Defendant:
AIR CANADA, INC., AIR FRANCE-KLM S.A., ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 24-1237
Appellant:
FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
Appellee:
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 24-1236
Appellant:
FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
Appellee:
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 24-1235
Appellant:
FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
Appellee:
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Mitchell v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 23-3811
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, J. BENEVIDAZ, Warden, PATRICK COVELLO, Warden and others
Lin v. Fedex Corporation
as 1:2023cv07944
Plaintiff:
Pingjin Lin
Defendant:
Fedex Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Todd v. Fedex Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv02879
Plaintiff:
David Todd and David Todd doing business as Impact
Defendant:
Fedex Corporation and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dimitar Petlechkov v. FEDEX Corporation, et al
as 23-12259
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIMITAR PETLECHKOV
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES INC and others
Armen Mard v. Tmobile, USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv06904
Petitioner:
Plaintiff Amen Mard
Defendant:
Tmobile, USA, Inc., Bank of America National Association, Asset Marketing Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Amen Mard
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
