Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Felton Ladell Humphries, Jr. v. Dan Samuels
as 2:2023cv04179
Petitioner:
Felton Ladell Humphries, Jr.
Respondent:
Dan Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Love v. Macomber et al
as 2:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Felton Love, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Kathleen Allison, Tracy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Macomber et al
as 2:2023at00391
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber and Felton Love, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tal Avitan et al v. Kimberly Kirchmeyer et al
as 2:2022cv08589
Petitioner:
Tal Avitan and Lauren Sara Samipur
Respondent:
Secretary Kimberly Kirchmeyer, CA Department of Consumer Affairs, The CA Contractors State License Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Brycen Daffern et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05027
Plaintiff:
Brycen Daffern, David Dahl, Susan Dailey and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
In the matter of Shane Felton Loomis, Bar #247574
as 3:2022mc80177
Respondent:
Shane Felton Loomis
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
(PC) Love v. Hill et al
as 2:2022cv01233
Plaintiff:
Felton Love, Jr.
Defendant:
Rick M. Hill, T. Johnson, J. Heckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown et al v. The University of Phoenix, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv02840
Plaintiff:
Felton Brown, Sophia Edwards, Peter Enzinger and others
Defendant:
The University of Phoenix, Inc. and Apollo Education Group, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
